Venue: Meeting Room 2, Civic Centre, Stone Cross, Northallerton
Contact: Democratic Services Officer 01609 767015
Election of Chairman
That Councillor G W Dadd be elected Chairman for duration of the meeting.
(Councillor G W Dadd in the Chair)
Exclusion of the Press and Public
To consider passing a resolution under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 excluding the press and public from the meeting during consideration of item 4 on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Act.
That under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the press and public were excluded from the meeting during consideration of the items of business at minute no SHP.19 on the grounds that it involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act as the Panel was satisfied that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information.
Allegations about a Town Council Member
Report of the Monitoring Officer
The subject of the decision:
The Deputy Monitoring Officer presented a report in relation to allegations that a Town Councillor (“the Town Councillor”) had:
(1) intimidated or attempted to intimidate the Complainant;
(2) acted in a way which failed to show respect to the Complainant;
(3) knowingly prevented, or attempted to prevent, the Complainant and others from accessing information to which they were entitled to by law; and
(4) conducted himself in a manner which could reasonably be regarded as bringing the Town Council, or the Town Councillor’s office as a member of the Town Council into disrepute.
The Panel heard from the person who had made the allegations (“the Complainant”) and the Town Councillor against whom the allegations had been made.
Alternative options considered:
The Panel considered all the options outlined in paragraph 3.3 of the Deputy Monitoring Officer’s report. Having concluded that the allegations were not upheld and therefore warranted no action to be taken, the Panel did not consider any alternative options to be appropriate in relation to these matters.
The reason for the decision:
The Panel considered:
· the Deputy Monitoring Officer’s report;
· the written and oral submissions of the Town Councillor
· the written and oral submissions of the Complainant
· the written submissions of two witnesses; and
· the Town Council’s Code of Conduct.
The Panel reached the following conclusions:
The Panel noted that the allegation related solely to the contents of an email dated 4th August 2016 sent by the Town Councillor to the Complainant.
The Complainant stated in his allegation that the email from the Town Councillor was intimidatory, disrespectful and aggressive towards the Complainant and in it the Town Councillor had attempted to prevent the Complainant and others from accessing information to which they are entitled. The Complainant told the Panel that the email was part of a wider issue that he had experienced with the Town Councillor and other town councillors. The Complainant told the Panel that he had written the letter alleging the breach of the Code of Conduct in the heat of the moment and, had he written it again now, he would not use the same opinionated language to describe the contents of the email.
The Town Councillor told the Panel that he did not accept that the email was a breach of the Code of Conduct in the manner in which it was alleged. The Town Councillor denied preventing the Complainant or any other person from accessing information to which they are entitled by law.
The Panel concluded that the contents of the email dated 4th August 2016 was unthreatening and no different from what would ordinarily be expected in correspondence between council members. The ... view the full minutes text for item SHP.20